OPINION

Why strong currency is anti-economic competition

By Odilim Enwegbara 
 
WHENEVER I listen to some of our economists proposing a stronger naira, I wonder on what economic development theory they are basing their argument. First, any proposal for a strong currency is never done with pro-real sector investment, pro-growth, pro-jobs or pro-poverty alleviation fully considered. That explains why I’m not only strongly opposed to this kind of economics. I always try to do so with enough convincing evidence to prove my case. I say so because to believe that the strength of any economy is dependent on the strength of its currency and as a result promotes its competitiveness only amounts to poor knowledge of the workings of modern international trade and why downward currency manipulation is the surest way to play to win in the economic competitiveness game.  So, the truth of the matter is that for any industrial economy to be continuously competitive or for any non-industrial economy to begin to industrialise, the first and the most important currency policy of such a country should focus on how best to make sure that imported consumer goods are priced out of its domestic market and later taken the price war overseas by also making sure that at international markets, locally made goods are made cheaper than such goods made elsewhere. This is only made possible by making sure that the country’s domestic currency is constantly manipulated downward by those in charge of the country’s currency policy.

That’s exactly what China has been doing and it is exactly what has degenerated to the ongoing currency war between the US and the People’s Republic of China.  It is why if we too want to truly industrialise, we too should make sure that not only do we cheaply produce most of the goods we consume, but also cheaply produce what many other countries too have to consume. In other words, made-in-Nigeria goods should be continuously cheaper than those same goods made elsewhere.  But for this to happen, we all know that the value of the naira should be kept artificially lower than its real market value, but above all lower than the value of most other major currencies, especially currencies of those economies which we intend to compete with.  This way, goods from these countries with strong currencies would be priced more expensively both in their own consumer markets and in Nigeria; while at the same time, Nigerian made goods get priced cheaper around the world. This will make Nigerian made goods gain more consumer patronage than their competitors.

As a result, millions of manufacturing jobs will be created in Nigeria while displacing competing firms wherever they may be found in the world.  That’s why naira at N500 per dollar isn’t as bad as most Nigerians are made to believe by most of our economists. As long as we make access to official forex to only those importers of industrial inputs, mostly importers of essential raw materials and plant and equipment, imported inflation resulting from import dependency will never arise.  Carrying out this new forex policy is the single policy needed to lessen the pressure on our foreign reserve accounts because it discourages importation of goods that can be cheaply and easily made locally. With most importers of finished consumer goods denied access to official forex and also required to prove beyond doubt the legitimate source of their forex, certainly, that will amount to making it difficult for those importers of cheap foreign made goods to access forex which will put a stop to the pressure such imported goods have on our foreign reserve accounts  This not only discourages the import of finished consumer products that tend to displace our infant industries and jobs. But by cheaply producing these goods locally the same goods being imported will be priced out in Nigeria.


 
This is the only way import substitution industrialisation will be made possible in Nigeria especially with the goal to quicken the country’s industrialisation to the extent that within a short period of time we too can begin to become one of the leading industrial economies in the world with millions of industrial jobs created along with millions of poor Nigerians lifted out of poverty and government revenue growing in such geometric progression.  This what really happened in China where with such smart policy China created more than 600 million jobs and close to 900 million of its 1.4 billion people lifted out of poverty during the past 39 years of its economic revolution driven by import substitution.

This is the kind of currency policy that we should be expecting the Odilim and friends monetary reform committee to be represented to our forthcoming book, “The Big Bang: Planning Nigeria’s Economic Revolution.” Since China adopted this policy of manipulating its currency, Yuan, downward while making sure its competitors’ currencies are kept artificially high, Chinese goods have continued to be far cheaper than goods from these competitors. In this currency war, China has always been beating the US for more than two decades now.  But also to ensure that the US does not devalue the dollar which would amount to double jeopardy for China, rather than going to demand from the US to pay it its over $4 trillion in dollar foreign reserves, knowing full well that that would amount to the US printing more dollars (possibly exactly that amount); which would, in fact, amount to the very devaluation of the dollar, it is only logical that acquiring strategic US Brownfield companies, important corporate buildings and resorts, farmlands, etc., remains the smartest thing China is doing without having to force the US to devalue the dollar.

That is the same reason why in the meantime, making sure that going forward China’s exposure to the dollar is drastically reduced, China has since engaged in currency swaps with most of its major trading partners around the world.  And with the currency swaps adoption, China is increasingly lessening its economy’s exposure to already badly battered Dollar which is fast losing its global de facto reserve currency power, which its collapse is only a matter of time. China rightly believes that when that happens, its Yuan will eventually replace dollar as the world’s reserve currency.   For Nigeria to get its economic development right this time around, Atiku Abubakar should emulate President Franklin Roosevelt’s and Chairman Deng Xiaoping’s kind of nationalist economic activism. At least, he should follow the recent foot-steps of Donald Trump who not only campaigned for “America First,” but who has been practicing his American First economic diplomacy. Personally, I don’t see anything wrong in a president prioritising the interests of those who gave him his mandate.

That is why even as envisaged President-elect, Atiku’s Economic Revival Team should be mandated to come up with all the clear steps his administration should be taking in order to trigger the unprecedented economic revolution through Nigeria’s economic diversification.  All these to be steps will ensure that for the first time in Nigeria the country’s economy is given a firm pathway toward industrialisation.
http://www.tribuneonlineng.com/why-strong-currency-is-anti-economic-competition/